The proposed changes would also set a precedent that the metropolitan delineation is a relative measure. Under the current standards, about 14 percent of the population lives in nonmetro areas; under the proposed standards, this figure would jump to about 20 percent. Yet the recommendation provides no empirical, scientifically sound formula nor explanation for what will trigger future threshold increases, nor how they should be calculated, leaving future changes open to political manipulation.
Changing the threshold also creates a break in series, posing significant complications for longitudinal statistical analysis and tracking rural realities over time.
There is no explanation of whether other options were considered. Deeper analysis and further consultation with external experts would ensure consideration of the full range of statistical implications, deepen the scientific basis for proposed changes, and shape guidelines for reviewing the standards in the future. Impacts federal funding and program administration—with the full scope unknown. The impact of the proposed change in MSA size on these programs has not been fully analyzed nor is it well-understood, and in some cases could be significant.
Previous federal attempts to evaluate the impact of changes to MSA standards on program administration, while helpful, are incomplete. In , the Government Accountability Office GAO examined the impact of proposed changes to the MSA standards on four federal programs, finding that they increased eligibility in some cases and had no effect in others.
However, one can easily point to specific examples of federal programs that are likely to be impacted by any change to the MSA standards. The Department of Health and Human Services HHS , for example, uses the MSA classification to tier reimbursements for Medicare services, offering hospitals higher reimbursement rates for inpatient operating costs in metro areas where wages are higher, while granting ambulances higher reimbursement rates in nonmetro areas.
For certain programs, remote rural areas with limited capacity may now have to compete with larger, better-resourced towns for the same pool of limited funding, to the chagrin of existing and newcomer nonmetros alike.
For example, local leaders from Wasau, Wisconsin to Rapid City, South Dakota have expressed concern that their reclassification to micropolitans might result in lost entitlement funding reserved for metros through the U. The proposed change is potentially so significant, and the statistical and financial consequences too insufficiently understood, for OMB to make an informed decision.
The nation stands at the precipice of a major effort to recover from the economic and social impacts of the COVID pandemic, while renewing investment in infrastructure, accelerating action on climate change, and dismantling the legacy of racism. Now is not the time for arbitrary action that challenges perceptions of fairness and community identity.
The MSA delineation has been tweaked and changed in a piecemeal fashion throughout the past several decades. While increased urbanization may be one consideration when reviewing the delineation, changes must be based on a clear, sound, scientific rationale that comprehensively considers how all dimensions of the delineation fit together to reflect metropolitan and nonmetropolitan status. In fact, a major fire tore through Lower Manhattan a year prior to when this map was published.
This route is still recognizable today as the Harlem Line. One very obvious difference between the two maps is how much land has been reclaimed along shorelines in the area. Battery Park City, on the west side of downtown, and the Brooklyn Navy Yard are two prominent examples of infill. Midtown Manhattan is worth zooming into for a couple of reasons. First, the outline of Central Park is visible, although the park would officially be approved until almost 20 years later.
As well, this topographical map clearly shows the numerous outcroppings spread across the island. Manhattan was far from flat in the s, and it took a tremendous amount of effort—starting with gunpowder, pickaxes, and horse-drawn carts—to level the land. Looking at these historical maps is a reminder that the New York City we know today is the product of hundreds of years of human effort, and that cities continue to evolve over time.
There are 8 common blood groups but 36 human blood types in total. Here we map the most widespread blood types in every country in the world. But not all blood is the same. Using data sourced from Wikipedia , we can map the most widespread blood types across the globe.
Of the 7. The rarest, meanwhile, is AB-, with only 0. Breaking it down to the national level, these statistics begin to change. It is also the most common blood type in Canada and the United States. The A blood group is common in Europe. Blood provides an ideal opportunity for the study of human variation without cultural prejudice. It can be easily classified for many different genetically inherited blood typing systems. Our individuality is a factor that helps determine our life, choices, and personalities.
But at the end of the day, commonalities like blood are what bring us together. Connect with us. There are two main divisions to consider when viewing this map: Metropolitan Areas metro areas have at least one urban core area of at least 50, population. These are the largest population centers, sometimes encompassing many counties. In some instances, these metro areas are further subdivided into Metropolitan Divisions.
Micropolitan Areas are the smallest areas measured on this map indicated by a lighter shade of green. These smaller regions, which are generally located further away from large cities, have at least one urban core area of at least 10, but fewer than 50, people.
Level Three: The Megaregion New York City is the ultimate challenge for planners looking to categorize population centers into a neat and tidy statistical box. Blurring the Lines Population patterns are constantly changing across the country, so the next version of this map may have a number of changes on it.
Statista Accounts: Access All Statistics. Basic Account. You only have access to basic statistics. Single Account. The ideal entry-level account for individual users.
Corporate solution including all features. Statistics on " Demographics of the U. Part I " The most important statistics. The most important statistics. Further related statistics. Further Content: You might find this interesting as well. Statistics U. Learn more about how Statista can support your business. US Census Bureau. March 26, Population of the largest metropolitan areas in the U. In Statista. Accessed November 14, Statista Inc..
0コメント